Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca / CC BY-NC-SA Ciencia Policial, 183, 43-89 88 CIENCIAPOLICIAL Rassin, E. (2018). Reducing tunnel vision with a pen-and-paper tool for the weighting of criminal evidence. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 15(2), 227-233. Reese, E. J. (2011). Techniques for mitigating cognitive biases in fingerprint identification. UCLa L. Rev., 59, 1252. Roux, C., Bucht, R., Crispino, F., De Forest, P., Lennard, C., Margot, P., Miranda, M. D., NicDaeid, N., Ribaux, O., Ross, A. y Willis, S. (2022). The Sydney declaration – Revisiting the essence of forensic science through its fundamental principles. Forensic Science International, 332, 111182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint. 2022.111182 Roux, C., Talbot-Wright, B., Robertson, J., Crispino, F., y Ribaux, O. (2015). The end of the (forensic science) world as we know it? The example of trace evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1674), 20140260. https:// doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0260 Roux, C., Willis, S. y Weyermann, C. (2021). Shifting forensic science focus from means to purpose: A path forward for the discipline? Science & Justice, 61(6), 678-686. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.scijus.2021.08.005 Saks, M. J. (2010). Forensic identification: From a faith-based “Science” to a scientific science. Forensic Science International, 201(1), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.03.014 Stacey, R. B. (2005). Report on the Erroneous Fingerprint Individualization in the Madrid Train Bombing Case, vol. 35, issue 1. https://archives. fbi.gov/archives/about-us/lab/forensic-science-communi cations/fsc/jan2005/special_report/2005_special_report.htm Steblay, N., Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., y McWethy, A. (2006). The impact on juror verdicts of judicial instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 30(4), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9039-7
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MzA5NDI2